09/17/96 HyperLaw, Inc.®




HyperLaw Icon
HyperLaw Letter to Judge Richey Re Conflict DOJ v. West-Thomson, September 15, 1996


HyperLaw Letter to Judge Richey Re Conflict DOJ v. West-Thomson, September 15, 1996


"Back to HyperLaw Home Page"

"Back to DOJ Antitrust Review of Thomson/West Merger Page"


Note: On Tuesday morning, September 17, 1996, the case was transferred and assigned to Judge Paul L. Friedman, USDJ, District of Columbia.
LAW OFFICES OF LORENCE L. KESSLER
1825 I STREET, N.W., SUITE 400
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
(202) 857-8067



September 15, 1996


Hand Deliver

The Honorable Charles R. Richey					

United States District Judge
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
U.S. Courthouse
3rd & Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20001

RE: 	U.S. v. The Thomson Corporation 
	and West Publishing Company, No. 96-1415

Dear Judge Richey:

After preparing my client's motion to participate as an 
amicus curiae in opposition to entry of the proposed final 
judgment in U.S. v. The Thomson Corporation and West 
Publishing Company, No. 96-1415, it has come to HyperLaw's 
attention that Clark Boardman Callaghan is the publisher 
of a book authored by Your Honor -- Richey, Charles R., 
Manual on Employment Discrimination and Civil Rights 
Actions in the Federal Courts.   
See attachment 1   attachment 2   Previously this book was published by Kluwer Law Book 
Publishers, Inc. and then by Michie.  The parties may not 
have informed you that the present publisher, Clark 
Boardman Callaghan, is a part of The Thomson Corporation, 
and that accordingly Your Honor appears to have a business 
relationship with one of the parties.

If after Clark Boardman Callaghan became the publisher, 
Your Honor has continued to participate in the publication 
of the book in any manner, there still is a relationship 
between Your Honor and West-Thomson.  Even if Your Honor 
no longer participates directly, West-Thomson continues to 
profit from sales proceeds and benefits from the prestige 
of publishing a book authored by Your Honor.  In any 
event, there would be a concern about the appearance of a 
conflict

We wish to raise this immediately because we are aware of 
other instances in which disclosures of business and other 
relationships between West as a party and a judge have 
surfaced only after a ruling--creating embarrassment to 
the judge and the federal judiciary.  See "U.S. Justices 
Took Trips from West Publishing and related stories in a 
 Minneapolis Star Tribune Series, March 5-7, 1995,
 http://www.startribune.com/stonline/html/westpub/index.html.  
Attachment 3 is an excerpt from that series referring 
to such a situation in State of Texas v. West Publishing 
Company, 882 F.2d 171 (5th Cir. 1989) which involved West 
copyright claims to state code codifications.  (The 
proposed consent decree and license agreement in the 
instant case ignore the issue of control over such state 
statutory material.)

In Matthew Bender & Company and HyperLaw, Inc. v. West 
Publishing Company, 94 Civ. 0589 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y) which is 
presently pending in the Southern District of New York, 
the initial judge recused herself.  See Memorandum and 
Order dated March 16, 1996, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3280.

The 1988 Kluwer version of Your Honor's book states:

This work has been developed in conjunction with 
programs sponsored by the Federal Judicial 
Centers' Division of Continuing Education and 
Training.

See attachment 4, Front Matter from 1988 Revised Edition.  
Apparently, the book was subsequently published by Michie.  
Thereafter, the book was published by Clark Boardman 
Callaghan.  We understand that the book was last updated 
in September, 1995, showing Your Honor as the author.  
Clark Boardman was purchased by the Thomson Corporation in 
1979 and the present incarnation of Clark Board Callaghan 
was created in 1989.

According to Kendall Svengalis in The Legal Information 
Buyer's Guide, p. 526-527:

Since 1991, the company [Clark Boardman Callaghan] 
has also significantly raised prices, both for the 
base titles and their supplements. ... The one 
major change has been the increasing 
transformation of former casebound treatise of 
Lawyer's Cooperative into the loose-leaf binder 
format, often with non-cumulative supplements.   
This trend has made it more difficult to skip 
supplements and buy in again at a later time.

Although the West-Thomson public relations effort 
surrounding the merger attempted to downplay West's 
extensive publication of secondary sources, West publishes 
at least three competing products -- Lewis, Litigating 
Civil Rights and Employment Discrimination Case.  Player, 
Employment Discrimination Law, Practitioner Treatise 
Series, Rothstein, Employment Law.  
 See http:// www.westpub.com/Practice/gen2empl.htm#litcivlew.  In addition to your book, 
Thomson companies publish a number of related titles 
including Eglit, Age Discrimination; CBC, Employment 
Coordinator; Smolla, Federal Civil Rights Acts; 
Steinglass, Section 1983 Litigation in State Courts; and 
Kushner, Government Discrimination: Equal Protection Law 
and Litigation.   http:// See http://www.cbclegal.com/catalog/employ/employ.htm, attachment 2 hereto.   
(My client does not believe that the Antitrust Division 
even attempted to determine market shares 
and competition by subject matter product line.)

Moreover, according to a statement submitted by Mr. 
Svengalis, who is the State Law Librarian of Rhode Island 
and was a consultant to DOJ during the merger review:

Divestiture of the fifty-one titles which comprise 
the major portion of this tentative agreement will 
have no appreciable or measurable impact upon the 
competitiveness of the legal publishing industry 
as a whole.  At least thirty-five of the fifty-one 
titles are of little significance in the broader 
marketplace.  Many of these titles are small, 
state specific titles with only local appeal.  In 
fact, the presence of these thirty-five titles in 
the list leads one to suspect they are Thomson-
West cast-offs, jettisoned to make the list and 
its impact appears larger than in really is.

See Exhibit A to Exhibit 6 to Lexis-Nexis motion.  A 
better argument could be made for the "divestiture" of 
Your  Honor's book than these thirty-five books.

The new West-Thomson entity is in a clearly unique 
position to publish CD-ROM versions of each of these 
employment and civil rights titles, linked to the full 
text of the opinions cited therein.  A large percentage of 
the cited opinions are from the United States District 
Courts.  Only West-Thomson could use the internal 
citations to its opinions on CD-ROM, providing West with 
an enormous advantage in the practitioner market.  West-
Thomson also has instant access to the archives of 
electronic versions of the court opinions and could add 
the full text of opinions with internal pagination to CD-
ROMs at no incremental cost.

Indeed, Clark Boardman Callaghan does have a CD-ROM 
entitled Employment Discrimination Power Link CD-ROM.  The 
Clark Boardman Callaghan product description states that 
its CD-ROM contains "a complete electronic library of 
primary source material."  Other publishers seeking to 
publish an employment law CD-ROM will first need to obtain 
the opinion files from court archives, which may be costly 
if not impossible because of the condition of court 
archives.  They would then have to convert the files to 
electronic versions.  Even then, they would have files 
that do not contain the corrections provided by judges 
directly to West (using West's Plate Correction or similar 
forms) most of which are not filed in court files.  For 
example, if a publisher wanted to create a competing CD-
ROM containing the full text of all opinions in citable 
form, it would incur extraordinary costs just to collect 
the opinions.  Under the proposed citation license, the 
publisher would then need to pay a license fee that would 
be the same whether 100 or 1000 copies were sold.  No 
small publisher could even consider such a proposition.

We would argue that no publisher which wished to create 
such a CD-ROM, other than West-Thomson could afford to 
independently obtain all of the opinions cited in Manual 
on Employment Discrimination and Civil Rights Actions in 
the Federal Courts from court files, locate all 
corrections made by the courts, convert these to 
electronic form, insert the West star pagination, and pay 
West a citation tax under the license agreement.

We note that other than West-Thomson, only Lexis-Nexis 
(and through them Matthew Bender) has access to these 
corrected court opinions.  Moreover, it is possible that 
pursuant to the 1988 secret agreements even Lexis cannot 
use the West internal citation on CD-ROMs.  [We note 
references in the exhibits attached to the Lexis-Nexis 
motion, to these 1 988 secret agreements--as well as to a 
new March 1996 secret agreement which was apparently 
executed just after the merger announcement, perhaps so 
that Lexis-Nexis would not publicly oppose the merger.  
 See Letter Dated August 30, 1996 from Michael S. Harris, 
General Counsel, The Thomson Corporation to Louis J. 
Andreozzi, General Counsel, Lexis-Nexis, Exhibit D to 
Exhibit 3, Declaration in Support of Lexis-Nexis 
Opposition.]  If it is true, as rumored, that the 1988 
secret agreements did  not permit use of the internal 
citations on CD-ROMs--even a Lexis subsidiary such as 
Michie could not publish a CD-ROM with the West internal 
pagination.  Indeed, were your book still being published 
by Michie, its future development and evolution as a CD-
ROM product would be substantially limited.

Thus, the publication and marketing of your book by West-
Thomson touches on many of the issues raised in this 
matter by HyperLaw, by the others who seek to be amicus 
curiae, and by Lexis-Nexis.

Because it appears that West, Thomson and the Department 
of Justice (which supposedly analyzed the products of 
these companies) have not brought this matter to the 
attention of the Court, HyperLaw, Inc. now does so.






Respectfully submitted,



_________________________________
Lorence L. Kessler
Counsel for HyperLaw, Inc.



cc:	Alan D. Sugarman, Esq.
	Carl J. Hartmann, Esq.
	Paul J. Ruskin, Esq.
	
Attach. 


By U.S. Mail to:


Gary E. Reback, Esq.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California  94304

Craig W. Conrath, Esq.
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
Merger Task Force
1401 H Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005

Wayne D. Collins, Esq.
Attorney for The Thomson Corporation
Shearman & Sterling
Citicorp Center
New York, New York 10022

James E. Schatz, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant West Publishing Company
Schatz Paquin Lockridge Grindal & Holstein P.L.L.P.
Suite 2200
100 Washington Avenue So.
Minneapolis, MN  55401

Steven D. Houck, Esq.
Chief Antitrust Bureau
Attorney General of New York
120 Broadway, Suite 2601
New York, NY 10271
State of Washington

Tina E. Kondo, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
900 Fourth Avenue
Suite 2000
Seattle, WA  98164



Kathleen E. Foote
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney General of the State of California
1300 I Street
Sacramento, CA  95814

Aaron S. Bayer
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105

Christine H. Rosso
Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
100 Randolph St.
12th Floor
Chicago, IL  60601

George K. Weber
Assistant Attorney General
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Chief, Consumer Protection and Antitrust Division
Public Protection Bureau
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA  02109

Kevin J. O'Connor
Assistant Attorney General
Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin
123 West Washington Ave.
Madison, Wisconsin 53717