Subject: ABA's Proposed Standard Citation System -- State and Federal Courts Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 12:23:25 PST From: weiner.esq@juno.com (JAMES T WEINER) To: citation@teo.uscourts.gov CC: johnl@ibm.net Dear Sir(s) Recently, I was informed that the Judicial Conference is seeking comment on the pote* * * I have not yet reviewed the ABA's proposal but I have been informed that the proposal * * * courts, which is published for free on the internet, usable by lawyers throughout their practice. Absent the adoption of such a citation system, the case law West claims a copyright in its page numbering, effectively prohibiting on-line publishers from providing citeable case law; and 2) current citation systems are based upon West's page numbering. I support the ABA's proposal because I believe that the courts should adopt a standard citation system that allows citation to all free access forms of federal and state case law and that such a system should be expanded to include all other laws such as statutes, rules and regulations. This citation system should allow easy access to, and citation of, all case law available through the internet. Further, such a citation system should not be dependent upon any privately owned, or copyrighted, * * * My reasons for this are several: I am a sole practitioner and I believe that development of a law library is one of the most daunting tasks for any solo or small firm practice today. I practice in both state and federal courts with complex litigation (mostly environmental). Therefore, if I chose to develop a law library I must spend approximately $2500 per year for each state and the same or more for federal case law * * * more. Alternatively, I may use paid electronic access through West or Lexis at the cost of $100-300 per month regardless of whether I use the service or not. The problem is that the internet allows me access to relevant state and federal case law for free (or $20.00 per month internet access). But without a mean information -- I must instead either buy a library or pay the $300 per month (for both state and federal access) or use the local law libraries -- at a treme* * * I have also been informed that some judges have suggested that attorneys would not un * * * dequate. While I believe that the change may be difficult to accept, some attorneys will switch immediately to on-line materials and many will switch to on-line materials as they become more widely accepted by the courts. This change will accelerate when the "hold outs" discover that they will not thereafter need a complete law library which is one of the most expensive parts of practicing law today. I believe that West may fight this proposal because it gets much of its profit from law related books where it is the sole source for the official citations * * * five years). However, I have been dismayed when states quit publishing their own "official" state case books in favor of West's regional reporters. (The state of Michigan has not stopped publishing its own reporters but the "official" citations are now to West's regional reporters.) I also believe that most state court took this action without recognizing the concentration of power that this puts in West -- and the extra cost that this may cause the attorneys practicing in those states. Further, I have never heard where any state made a "deal" with West to allow the information to be freely available at no cost. I am a businessman and a staunch capitalist. However, I believe that no state or local government should simply "give" any private company a monopoly on acc* * * recent actions of these states gives West a further "stranglehold" on this information and strengthens its monopoly on providing law books at an ever increasing cost which directly affects the cost of practicing law and the cost of providing law services to our clients. Therefore, I wholeheartedly support the ABA's proposed standard citation system that would allow direct citation to on-line materials. I hope my comments assist you in your deliberations. If you desire any additional comments please feel free to contact me. Sincerely; James T. Weiner, Esq. James T. Weiner, P.C. 30600 Telegraph, Suite 3350 Bingham Farms, Michigan 48025 Telephone; (810) 901-0750 Fax: (810) 901-0500 E-mail: weiner.esq@juno.com